The traditional internet marketing model is simple:
Have a squeeze page on the homepage, that sits infront of a salesletter… And tacked in behind the scenes, you have a bunch of traffic-generation articles.
Fundamentally, this model is flawed.
Sure, it works to convert traffic into sales - but no better or worse than taking these same pages off your site’s homepage, and putting them into a subdirectory.
You might get more people visiting your sales letter (or squeeze page) if you put it on the homepage - but you’ll get fewer people visiting your site overall.
So what do you do with your homepage?
Give something away!
Give away some value somewhere. Offer articles, advice, free software, calculators, tools - whatever.
Ranking well in search engines is important - sure, you shouldn’t rely on it for ALL your traffic - but a sales letter is rarely going to rank well in search engines. It’s not optimised to rank, and (with the exception of affiliate links) it’s not going to attract links.
Links are a critical factor for improving your search engine rankings.
A sales letter on your homepage makes it harder to get links to your site.
That’s because there is no incentive for people to link to a sales letter.
Here’s an example of why it pays to build sites around content rather than a “pitch”:
Scott Bywater is a highly respected Australian direct response copywriter.
I know Scott’s invested a lot of time, effort and money into SEO for his web-site. His site’s older than mine, he has a better name in the industry, and is a far more prolific copywriter than I am.
I’ve invested practically no time into SEO - just setting up my Wordpress site initially.
All things being equal, Scott should outrank me for search terms like “copywriter“.
But I outrank Scott.
I have more links, for less effort and less cost.
The difference is that I’m running a content-based site (and at the bottom of each post, still offering a squeeze and a pitch on each post), and Scott’s running a Squeeze page focussed site.
Brent
Tags:SEOPopularity: 30%
StumbleUpon
Digg
del.icio.us
Technorati
RSS
Email This
4 responses so far ↓
1 Gavin Allinson // Apr 19, 2008 at 5:08 pm
How much of an outranking factor is it that you are using Wordpress?
2 Brent Hodgson // Apr 19, 2008 at 6:48 pm
Hi Gavin,
You raise a good point - it could be the platform. However (anecdotally) I’ve find it’s rare to see blogs ranking on the front page for search terms.
So I don’t think it’s the platform - I think it’s the depth of content, and the ability to get links from quality sources.
Brent
3 Charles Cuninghame // Apr 19, 2008 at 11:10 pm
What about the frequency you post fresh content?
4 Brent Hodgson // Apr 20, 2008 at 12:37 am
I’m not so sure about this one, Charles.
I suspect that one of the reasons that Wordpress sites [generally] don’t rank well is because they’re constantly changing (i.e. - always posting fresh content).
Because the “semantic” meaning of the page changes so often, the page isn’t about a single thing long enough to rank well for that single term.
It’s a theory - I can’t prove it one way or another - but it stands up.
Leave a Comment